Osteoporosis is a condition that weakens bones, making them more likely to fracture. For people with this condition, exercise programs that improve strength, balance, and posture are a way to reduce the risk of falls and broken bones. However, individuals with osteoporosis may face obstacles to exercising, such as the cost of programs, a lack of knowledge about safe exercises, and a fear of injury. For these reasons, they often prefer small, supervised group exercise programs that are easy to follow and designed for their specific needs.
This research focused on putting a group exercise program into practice at an outpatient private practice physiotherapy clinic, which is a clinic where people receive physical therapy appointments without being admitted to a hospital. The study looked at whether a program led by a physiotherapist could be successfully implemented for people with low bone density or a high risk of falls.
The program was designed for adults who have osteoporosis or are at risk of developing it. A formal process called the "knowledge-to-action framework" was used to guide the program's implementation. Participants were enrolled in a six-week exercise course. The classes were held twice a week and lasted for 60 minutes. The exercises focused on building whole-body strength and improving balance. To support their continued exercise, participants were given a take-home booklet.
A total of 43 people participated, consisting of 41 females and 2 males. The average age was 72, with the ages ranging from 60 to 84 years old. After the program, participants provided written feedback.
The study found that the group exercise program was successfully integrated into the clinic's services. All participants reported enjoying the exercises, the social interactions within the group, and the instructor. They also found the take-home booklet helpful. Participants suggested two improvements: reducing the class size to nine people to better fit the available space and adding pictures to the exercise booklet.
Initial physical assessments showed that the program was beneficial. Participants showed improvements in lower body strength, grip strength, posture, and balance. The most significant improvement was seen in the "30-second sit-to-stand" test, which measures lower body strength. On average, participants were able to complete 3.1 more repetitions of standing up from a chair in 30 seconds. This improvement was statistically significant, which means it is very unlikely to be a result of chance. An increase in lower body strength is useful for daily activities like getting up from a chair.
The program proved to be safe, enjoyable, and possible to run in a clinic setting. In conclusion, both the patients and the clinic staff provided positive feedback on the program's implementation. Future work on this program will need to address its sustainability, which is the ability for the clinic to offer it long-term, and its accessibility for people with osteoporosis. Future research could also explore if participants continue to exercise after the program is over and test the program in different settings.